So creating a new repo on GitHub, you get a set of getting started steps. They changed the default branchname to “main” from “master” due to its connotations with slavery.

When I create a new repo now, the initial getting started steps recommend creating a branch named “master” as opposed to “main” as it was a while ago.

It’s especially weird since the line git branch -M master is completely unnecessary, since git init still sets you up with a “master” branch.

Disclaimer: I have a bunch of private repos, and my default branchnames are pretty much all “master”.

Is this a recent change?

Edit: Mystery solved, my default branchname is “master”. Thanks [email protected] !

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    433 months ago

    God I wish. The change to “main” was pointless and unnecessary. It’s almost like people want to find problems when there aren’t any.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I like it, because it forced people not to assume master is the main branch. If something is common enough to almost be a standard, but it’s not actually a standard, it’s just waiting for disaster.

      These assumptions cause unnecessary breakage, but people will make them unless forced not to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          And yet not everyone used to use master, so scripts kept breaking for no good reason.

          Either make it a standard, or stop assuming it’s a standard. De-facto isn’t good enough.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            63 months ago

            Having a magical standard fairy waive a wand isn’t going to fix scripts, or stop them from breaking.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              What? If there’s an actual standard, it will stop scripts from breaking, because the assumption that master is the main branch will always be true.

              • clif
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                I’ll find something else to screw up and cause it to break, don’t worry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      223 months ago

      I prefer main simply because it faster to type. I propose main branches be renamed to “m”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      Honestly I feel like people who had an issue with this were just as much making an issue out of nothing. I personally also think that “master” is just as much a normal and valid name as “main”, and to me the rename kinda felt like performative bullshit. But at the same time it’s just a name, if it makes people happy I don’t really care either. Nowadays I tend to use main, but it’s not something I really pay attention to.