fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前Don’t repeat 5G mistakes with 6G, plead mobile operatorswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up1184arrow-down16
arrow-up1178arrow-down1external-linkDon’t repeat 5G mistakes with 6G, plead mobile operatorswww.theregister.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square71linkfedilink
minus-squareEvotech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 个月前5 is good enough. Let’s do something else
minus-squarepython@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前We should follow in the footsteps of many tech companies and stop numbering the Gs in favour of tagging on the year they were launched. So next year we wouldn’t get 6G, we would get G2027. Sounds much cooler, doesn’t it?
minus-squarewonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前Or change the G to Gen like it always is when used as an abbreviation for generation, so that people don’t think it means GHz or Gb/s…
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前I’d like a different letter while we’re at it as well. I think q would be good. I want 2q data.
5 is good enough. Let’s do something else
We should follow in the footsteps of many tech companies and stop numbering the Gs in favour of tagging on the year they were launched. So next year we wouldn’t get 6G, we would get G2027. Sounds much cooler, doesn’t it?
Or change the G to Gen like it always is when used as an abbreviation for generation, so that people don’t think it means GHz or Gb/s…
I’d like a different letter while we’re at it as well. I think q would be good. I want 2q data.