• [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 个月前

    Sure, but if they say you have to be in control at all times to pass blame then they need to call it driver assist or something other than “full self driving”.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 个月前

      They can call it whatever they want, the bottom line is that a human is behind the wheel and ultimately they’re responsible.

      And I think it has been well established at this point that fsd isn’t ready yet, that it’s not safe. The fact that they call it “full self driving” is cute… but it’s marketing, it’s not a get out of jail free card.

      Edit: Hah. So many down votes! Well go ahead, down vote personal responsibility! I mean, suggesting maybe people are responsible for the choices they make, fuck me right!

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 个月前

      Okay, so the name sucks, but if my kid breaks her laptop, I still gotta pay it. I didn’t break it. The kid broke it. But it’s still my responsibility.

      I don’t have a kid. If I did, I’d hope I had a kid who wouldn’t break nice things. But, let’s be real. Kids and cats break nice things. I also don’t have a Tesla. But if you own something (or you have a pet or a child) you are still responsible for what they do.

      It’s going to be interesting if we ever get those cars that go out on our behalf and do ride sharing gigs while we’re at work, earning back the money they spend keeping themselves charged. I wanna say one of the EV makers floated that idea. It never happened. But if it did, while you’re at work your car does damage. Who are they going to blame? Maybe you have insurance that covers it. But you’d still be responsible.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        This argument is just bonkers. Are you conflating a child and a corporations claim for a car to be fully self driving? These aren’t even comparable things.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        yeah if its named absolutely no liabilty to you we will take all the blame because we guarantee our car has full self driving capability. well thats just a name. it does not mean anything.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 个月前

          You may want to familiarize yourself with marketing, before you indict half the economy.

          But the name is “Fill Self Driving (Supervised)”. See, no fraud, just a balance of marketing and legaleze, lying and technicalities

          • baines@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 个月前

            don’t care about business speak

            charge the rest of them too

            the world could do with less business majors